Comments for Dating with Dan

Comment on Jackie 1 by Dan

Dan — Wed, 16 May 2012 23:42:51 +0000

Yes, so you’ve said. The man is just inscrutable, I guess.

Comment on Jackie 1 by LOL

LOL — Tue, 15 May 2012 23:22:33 +0000

You just don’t understand the genius of Larry David.

Comment on Kelly end by Dan

Dan — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:18:49 +0000

I’m glad you’re still reading. And yeah, it is, but she made a point of keeping count. It seemed important to her that she could claim to remember all of their (well, our) names.

Comment on Kelly end by Dan

Dan — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:17:32 +0000

Well . . . okay.

Comment on Kelly end by Leslie

Leslie — Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:46:05 +0000

God, I love your blogs.
Seventy-five is quite a large number…I’m surprised she even kept count.

Comment on Kelly end by Jane

Jane — Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:42:24 +0000

update!!!!!

Comment on Kelly end by Dan

Dan — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:41:00 +0000

The wedding seemed too . . . heavy, I guess is the word. It was a friends-and-family sort of affair, and we’d only been seeing each other for a few weeks. She only even knew the names of one or two of my friends. And I’m pretty skittish even under ideal circumstances. (Ask anybody). Which, I’ll grant you, is kind of a bullshit reason, but it’s the only one I’ve got.

Comment on Kelly end by Jane

Jane — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:39:01 +0000

why didn’t you go to the wedding?

Comment on Kelly end by Ash

Ash — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:20:15 +0000

Now, now…as someone who has had sex, and first date sex with Dan, I will say he is quite good at it and isn’t petty. And I’ll emphasize, again…he’s quite, quite good at it. Quite.

Comment on Kelly end by Tim

Tim — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:03:58 +0000

Perhaps Kelly was meeting guys online every few weeks and fucking them on the first date, knowing full well as it happened that she wouldn’t date them for various petty reasons. Sound familiar? You’re hardly in a position to judge. Maybe she was just better at it than you are.